Hi guys!
Remember – the second assignment is not a research paper – it is a thesis proposal. This means that it should describe the topic you plan to research, initial hypotheses about that topic and research questions stemming from these assumptions, research approaches and scientific methodology, and any expected results. The proposal should include a section on research sources – both primary and secondary – and how you plan to use these to support your research, including a brief and topical literary review. Finally, your proposal should include a section on how this research will contribute to existing knowledge on the subject.
The annotated bibliography is different. It is a thematic consideration of the published literature on your subject of study. This may be arranged thematically or chronologically. If you have a subject that considers vast periods of time, you may want to organise your sub-categories of study chronologically i.e. (literature on medieval concepts of time, early modern concepts of time, industrial concepts of time) or discuss chronological periods within broader area categories (Asian concepts of time in the pre-industrial to post-industrial periods, European concepts of time in the pre-industrial to post-industrial periods). You may also want to arrange your annotated bibliography according to the chronology of the scientific study of the subject. For example, discussing the early anthropologists of the 1920′s-30′s, the Anglophone and communist cultural studies theorists and the French school from the 1940′s to the 1970′s, then the “New Economic” theorists and case-study proponents of the 1970′s and 80′s, the post-modernists and cultural psychologists of the 1970′s to 1990′s and the current penchant for managerial and neuropsychological inquiries into the subject.
Once you’ve decided which approach to take – thematic (including thematic chronology) or chronological (in terms of the published literature), then you arrange your secondary sources according to how they contribute to the themes or chronological trends in the literature, briefly critiquing the contributions to give a picture of the major scientific approaches to the subject as they’ve developed since the beginning of the study of that subject. Introductions and conclusions to an annotated bibliography do not need to be complex – a few sentences each (4-5) to point out major trends and developments in the area of study will suffice.
Although only 5 pages, neither of these assignments is particularly easy. Done correctly, they will require you to organise your thoughts, know-how and readings on your chosen subject to produce coherent documents. Once you’ve done this, however, they should make thesis writing much easier!
We’ll discuss this in class!
All the best!
Pete
Filed under: written work | Leave a Comment »